Skip to main content
· 10/15/1885

Missouri Glass Co. v. Copeland Sewing Machine Co.

Citations

  • 88 Mo. 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where there is no possibility of imprisonment “the defendant does not have a right to appointed counsel”
  • majority opinion upholding that the defendant did not permanently abandon his sweatshirt when he gently tossed it on the ground before entering the convenience store and reversing the trial court’s determination that the sweatshirt was “temporarily abandoned”
  • due process requires that child in truancy proceeding be afforded counsel
  • abandonment determined from objective facts at hand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sherwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.