· 10/15/1885
Missouri Glass Co. v. Copeland Sewing Machine Co.
Citations
- 88 Mo. 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where there is no possibility of imprisonment “the defendant does not have a right to appointed counsel”
- majority opinion upholding that the defendant did not permanently abandon his sweatshirt when he gently tossed it on the ground before entering the convenience store and reversing the trial court’s determination that the sweatshirt was “temporarily abandoned”
- due process requires that child in truancy proceeding be afforded counsel
- abandonment determined from objective facts at hand
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sherwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.