Missouri Electric Light & Power Co. v. Carmody

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the second step of the Batson analysis requires the proponent of the challenge to provide a gender-neutral explanation for the challenge
• \The trial judge need not proceed to step three of the Batson process when no constitutionally permissible reason has been proffered at step two.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).