Missouri Dredging Co. v. Tug Southern Kraft No. 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• saying that the agency’s “submission and certification of [the] administrative record as filed is entitled to a strong presumption of regularity”
• “plaintiff must do more than imply that the documents at issue were in the 17 [government agency’s] possession. . . . Rather, plaintiff must prove that the documents 18 were before the actual decisionmakers involved in the determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).