Mississippi Valley Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern Natural Gas Company, Intervenors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court “will benefit from deferring review until the agency’s policies have crystallized and the question[s] arise[ ] in some more concrete and final form”
• explaining that at the conclusion of ratemaking, the court will have “jurisdiction to review the entire proceeding”
• finding that a local distribution company had standing to challenge FERC’s adjustment of a pipeline’s rates
• finding that a local distribution company had standing to challenge FERC’s adjustment of a pipeline’s rates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).