Mississippi v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “either actual knowledge of the falsity 17 of a statement, or reckless disregard for its truth, satisfies 18 the scienter requirement for nondischargeability of a debt under 19 § 17(a)(2) [predecessor to § 523(a)(2)(A)].”
• holding that “either actual knowledge of the falsity 17 of a statement, or reckless disregard for its truth, satisfies 18 the scienter requirement for nondischargeability of a debt under 19 § 17(a)(2) [predecessor to § 523(a)(2)(A)].”
• explaining that the filing of a Proof of Claim subjects the claimant to the equitable jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court
• bankruptcy court has exclusive jurisdiction over allowance and disallowance of bankruptcy claims against debtor
• by filing proof of claim, one submits to bankruptcy court jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).