Mississippi v. Tennessee
Citations
- 595 U.S. 15
- 142 S. Ct. 31
- 211 L. Ed. 2d 230
About this case
Mississippi v. Tennessee
Mississippi v. Tennessee, 595 U.S. 15 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the waters of the Middle Claiborne Aquifer are subject to the judicial remedy of equitable apportionment .[1] [2]
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_v._Tennessee&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: References")
- ↑ Mississippi v. Tennessee, No. 22O143 , 595 U.S. ___ (2021).
- ↑ "In dispute over groundwater, court tells Mississippi it's equitable apportionment or nothing" . SCOTUSblog. November 23, 2021. Retrieved October 31, 2024.
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_v._Tennessee&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: External links")
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court . As a work of the U.S. federal government , the text is in the **public domain **.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mississippi_v._Tennessee&oldid=1330682350 "
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
Judges: John G. Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court· 1906-02-19· cited 1,300×
- Sporhase v. Nebraska Ex Rel. DouglasSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 201×
- Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 175×
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court· 1945-06-11· cited 140×
- Wyoming v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1922-06-05· cited 115×
- Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. HerrmannSupreme Court· 2013-06-13· cited 77×
- Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. City of Memphis, Tenn.Fifth Circuit· 2009-06-05· cited 74×
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court· 1995-05-30· cited 58×
- Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1982-12-13· cited 46×
- Idaho Ex Rel. Evans v. OregonSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 26×
- South Carolina v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2010-01-20· cited 20×
- Virginia v. MarylandSupreme Court· 2003-12-09· cited 19×
- Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. City of Memphis, Tenn.N.D. Mississippi· 2008-02-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.