Mississippi Protection & Advocacy System, Inc. v. Paul Cotten, Individually and in His Official Capacity, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that facilities have an affirmative duty to implement policies and practices that promote effective P&A access
• holding that facilities have an affirmative duty to implement policies and practices that promote effective P&A access
• upholding injunction that permitted the advocacy service access to defendant center pursuant to “time and place restrictions tailored to minimize interference with the Center’s programs”
• noting court's \full accord\ with district court's conclusions regarding necessity of P & A access to individuals
• affirming time and place restrictions on access as a means to minimize interference with programs
• requiring “special circumstances” for applying exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).