Mississippi Interstate Express, Inc. v. Transpo, Inc., Azcal, Inc. And Robert Zoller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff made “at least a prima facie showing” that defendants conspired to defraud plaintiff despite discrepancies over ownership relationship between defendants
• finding noncontracting defendants subject to personal jurisdiction because plaintiff implicated all defendants in alleged fraudulent conspiracy to obtain plaintiff's services for free
• California defendant’s national business makes it more reasonable for it to expect distant forum litigation
• “All shipments were initiated by defendant, the tasks of directing the details of such shipments were ones in which defendants exercised a significant measure of control .... ”
• defendant’s “exercise[] [of] a significant measure of control” over activities in the forum state satisfied purposeful availment
• “[W]hether the minimum contacts are sufficient to justify subjection of the non-resident to suit in the forum is determined . . . under the particular facts upon the quality and nature of the activity with relation to the forum state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).