Mississippi Bar v. Pepper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that zoning commissions act in legislative capacity when they amend zoning regulations
• declining to resolve whether all plaintiffs were aggrieved when one plaintiff's standing to appeal is established
• not appropriate for reviewing court to attempt to glean such formal, collective statement from minutes of discussion by commission members prior to commission vote
• “[i]n the absence of a formally adopted comprehensive plan, a town’s comprehensive plan is to be found in the scheme of the zoning regulations themselves” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• only one plaintiff-appellant must prove aggrievement in order for court to decide merits of case
• only one plaintiff-appellant must prove aggrievement in order for court to decide merits of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).