· 5/19/1886
Misseldine v. State
Citations
- 21 Tex. Ct. App. 335
- 17 S.W. 768
- 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 144
Syllabus
<p>Hog Theft—Fact Case.—See the statement of the ease for evidence held insufficient to support a conviction for the theft of hogs under the value of twenty dollars.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing whether the defendant’s statements were the result of custodial interrogation despite the trial court’s failure to make findings of fact when the officer was the only witness who testified at the suppression hearing and “the evidence is not in dispute”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.