Misiulis v. Milbrand Maintenance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant premises owners were “vicariously liable for the negligence of their independent contractor in making repairs on the leased premises which resulted in injury to plaintiff, a business invitee”
• discussing the possibility of confusion arising from a disregard of the distinction between claims based on vicarious and direct liability
• discussing the possibility of confusion arising from a disregard of the distinction between claims based on vicarious and direct liability
• lessor of a shopping center held vicariously liable for injuries to a tenant’s business invitee who struck a pile of gravel and debris left in the parking lot by independent contractor hired to repair the roof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).