· 5/12/2009
Misicki v. Caradonna
Citations
- 12 N.Y.3d 511
- 909 N.E.2d 1213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- it “remain[s] for a jury to decide whether a violation [of 12 NYCRR 23–9.2(a)], in fact, occurred; and whether the negligence of some party to, or participant in, the construction project caused plaintiff’s injuries”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lippman and Judges Ciparick and Jones Concur With Judge Read Judge Graffeo Dissents and Votes to Affirm in a Separate Opinion Judge Smith Dissents in Another Opinion in Which Judge Pigott Concurs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.