Mishal Bin Saud v. The Bank of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while “newly discovered evidence does not” ordinarily “preclude the application of res judicata,” we recognize an exception “when the evidence . . . could not have been discovered with due diligence”
• res judicata not applicable where newly available evidence could not have been discovered previously with due diligence
• “As a general rule, newly discovered evidence does not preclude the application of res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).