Misek-Falkoff v. Keller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that emotional distress claim was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim where publication of defamatory communication charged plaintiff with criminal conduct
• e-mail circulated saying plaintiff needed “psychiatric treatment” and was like “an emotionally disturbed child”;' IIED claim dismissed
• e-mail circulated saying plaintiff needed “psychiatric treatment” and was like “an emotionally disturbed child”; IIED claim dismissed
• statements made by one employee about a second employee to supervisors and members of the Personnel Department investigating a dispute fall within qualified privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Misek-Falkoff v. Keller

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Misek-Falkoff v. Keller
  Supreme Court· 1996-02-20