Mischlich v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s equitable imposition of a constructive trust on defendants’ interests in a corporation based on defendants previous “participation in the fraudulent conveyance”
• collapsing transactions where each part of the transaction was dependent on the occurrence of the other and the defendant would not have consented to one of the transactions if the other would not occur
• affirming district court where fraudulent transfer involved owners laundering the assets of one company they owned to another as part of an overall scheme to make assets unavailable to creditors
• affirming district court where fraudulent transfer involved owners laundering the assets of one company they owned to another as part of an overall scheme to make assets unavailable to creditors
• upholding imposition of constructive trust for fraudulent conveyance to prevent unjust enrichment
• “The third requirement for finding a fraudulent conveyance is that creditors have been prejudiced by the transaction in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).