Skip to main content
· 2/24/2010

MIRUTIL v. State

Citations

  • 30 So. 3d 588
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2094
  • 2010 WL 624179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing for resentencing where “testimony regarding the new offenses was the central feature of the sentencing hearing” and the trial court commented that the State had shown probable cause for the new offenses
  • applying this standard where the claim was preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Cortiñas, Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.