MIRROR AND SHOWER DOOR PRODUCTS INC. v. Seabridge Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that only immaterial errors and omissions in the form of the notice to owner have been excused by courts
• noting that “the plain language of section 713.06 indicates the legislature’s intent that service of a written notice which includes the warnings contained in section 713.06(2)(c
• dismissing appellant's complaint for failure to state a cause of action where appellant failed to comply with the notice to owner requirement
• \[O]nly immaterial errors and omissions in the form of the notice have been excused by the courts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).