Skip to main content
· 10/20/2004

Miron v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Citations

  • 342 F. Supp. 2d 324
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27415
  • 2004 WL 2418008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he FAA’s requirement that a court stay ‘the trial of the action’ suggests that the proceedings must be stayed in their entirety, even when the action encompasses both arbitrable and non-arbitrable claims.”
  • “When an arbitration clause provides for arbitration of all matters ‘arising under’ or ‘arising out of’ a particular agreement, the clause is typically construed broadly to suggest that a given dispute is arbitrable.”
  • “When an arbitration clause provides for arbitration of all matters ‘arising under’ or ‘arising out of’ a particular agreement, the clause is typically construed broadly to suggest that a given dispute is arbitrable.”
  • finding this same clause to be broad on its face

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joyner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.