Skip to main content
· 9/13/2023

Mirna J. DeBlois, etc. v. Jose Dominguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissal in Pullman case appropriate if - necessary to remove obstacles to state court jurisdiction
  • “Where there is an action pending in state court that will likely resolve the state-law questions underlying the federal claim, we have regularly ordered abstention.”
  • Texas constitution might settle question of entitlement to office of incumbent redistricted justices of the peace
  • abstention to avoid premature constitutional adjudication where there exists unsettled question of state law
  • cited recently in 2006 by the Fist Circuit Court in Rivera-Feliciano v. Acevedo-Vila, 438 F.3d at 61
  • action challenging removal of justices of peace and constables after redistricting of precincts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.