· 9/13/2023
Mirna J. DeBlois, etc. v. Jose Dominguez
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissal in Pullman case appropriate if - necessary to remove obstacles to state court jurisdiction
- “Where there is an action pending in state court that will likely resolve the state-law questions underlying the federal claim, we have regularly ordered abstention.”
- Texas constitution might settle question of entitlement to office of incumbent redistricted justices of the peace
- abstention to avoid premature constitutional adjudication where there exists unsettled question of state law
- cited recently in 2006 by the Fist Circuit Court in Rivera-Feliciano v. Acevedo-Vila, 438 F.3d at 61
- action challenging removal of justices of peace and constables after redistricting of precincts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.