Mirlisena v. Miami Univ.
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 822
Syllabus
Summary judgment Civ.R. 56 negligence sexual assault. The court found that there was no support for a special relationship between the university and plaintiff to create a duty to protect plaintiff, and even if there was a type of special relationship with plaintiff necessary to create a duty to protect, since her attacker's criminal acts were not foreseeable the university could not have violated that duty. Summary judgment granted in favor of defendant.
Judges: McGrath
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.