Mires v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there is a new action where plaintiff “sought permission to file -- and, with the government’s consent and district court’s permission, did file -- an amended complaint”
• concluding that there is a new action where plaintiff “sought permission to file -- and, with the government’s consent and district court’s permission, did file -- an amended complaint”
• refusing to vacate judgment or dismiss when “representative cured the jurisdictional deficiency while his suit was pending”
• distinguishing McNeil, where the plaintiff did nothing to commence a new action after exhausting administrative remedies, and allowing a petitioner, with the government’s consent, to file an amended complaint curing an exhaustion problem
• “[A] litigant generally may raise a court’s lack of subject-matter jurisdiction at any time in the same civil action—even on appeal.”
• “A federal court must, in every case and at every stage of the proceeding, satisfy itself as to its own jurisdiction.” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).