Mirant Corp. v. the Southern Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a claim will neither interfere with nor advance the bankruptcy process, expediting the bankruptcy process is not relevant to the withdrawal decision
• observing that “[t]he principles announced in Marathon would be violated if such an intertwinement theory were to be given effect”
• observing that “[t]he principles announced in Marathon would be violated if such an intertwinement theory were to be given effect”
• disagreeing with the bankruptcy court that “non-core claims were so intertwined with the other claims in the complaint” that core bankruptcy jurisdiction lay
• considering Holland America factors in determination of motion to withdraw reference
• claims for unlawful dividend, alter ego, and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty are non-core

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).