Mirando v. United States Department of Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts have discretion to grant or deny a request to file a surreply
• plaintiff was judicially estopped from bringing a tax refund claim that contradicted his prior plea agreement for income tax evasion
• “[B]ecause Mirando expressly acknowledged the accuracy of the provisions of his plea agreement by signing and entering it, Rule 11(b)(3) has been satisfied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).