Miranda v. Universal Financial Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that borrower is entitled to return of any payments made to former assignee if she prevails in her suit to enforce her right to rescind
• “Unlike a statutory damages claim against an assignee under § 1641(a), a rescission claim against an assignee under § 1641(c) may be brought even if there is no TILA violation apparent on the face of the loan documents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).