Miranda-Leyva v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that local officers “assigned to an FBI Joint Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force” were “federally deputized for their Task Force work,” and thus the claim was “properly brought” as a Bivens action
• holding that local officers “assigned to an FBI Joint Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force” were “federally deputized for their Task Force work,” and thus the claim was “properly brought” as a Bivens action
• noting that because the defendant officers were deputized members of a DEA task force, plaintiff’s claim was properly brought as a Bivens action
• “[B]ecause Scarazzini and McAllister were federally deputized for their Task Force work, this claim was properly brought . . . as a Bivens action.”
• “[B]ecause Scarazzini and McAllister were federally deputized for their Task Force work, this claim was properly brought . . . as a Bivens action.”
• “[B]ecause Scarazzini and McAllister were federally deputized for their Task Force work, this claim was properly brought ... as a Bivens action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).