Skip to main content
· 6/21/1994

Mirand v. City of New York

Citations

  • 637 N.E.2d 263
  • 84 N.Y.2d 44
  • 614 N.Y.S.2d 372
  • 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 1345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he duty owed derives from the simple fact that a school, in assuming physical custody and control over its students, effectively takes the place of parents and guardians.”
  • stating that, under New York law, schools must “adequately supervise the students in their charge and . . . will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision”
  • examining a jury verdict to assess whether it was irrational
  • “Actual or constructive notice to the school of prior similar conduct is generally required because, obviously, school personnel cannot reasonably be expected to guard against all of the sudden, spontaneous acts that take place among students . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ciparick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.