Mir Iqbal v. Tejaskumar Patel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Seventh Circuit has not abandoned the standard
• noting that the “intertwined” inquiry is inconsistent with Exxon
• claims not barred because chal- lenged racketeering enterprise “predate[d] the state litigation and caused injury independently of it”
• “[F]raud (no matter how described) does not permit a federal district court to set aside a state court’s judgment in a civil suit.”
• claims not barred because chal- lenged racketeering enterprise “predate[d] the state litigation and caused injury independently of it”
• “[F]raud (no matter how described) does not permit a federal district court to set aside a state court’s judgment in a civil suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).