Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 4/29/1942

Mintz v. Premier Cab Ass'n

Citations

  • 127 F.2d 744
  • 75 U.S. App. D.C. 389
  • 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It was for the jury to decide from all the evidence ... whether [appellant] was merely unlucky or was ‘claim-minded’”
  • ”[T]he prosecuting witness in a rape case may be asked whether she has made similar charges against other men____” (footnote omitted)
  • \[T]he prosecuting witness in a rape case may be asked whether she has made similar charges against other men....\ (footnote omitted)
  • cross-examination of plaintiff about two prior personal injury claims
  • cross-examination of plaintiff about two prior personal injury claims
  • such evidence worth more than it costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Groner, Miller, Edgerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.