Mintz v. Premier Cab Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It was for the jury to decide from all the evidence ... whether [appellant] was merely unlucky or was ‘claim-minded’”
• ”[T]he prosecuting witness in a rape case may be asked whether she has made similar charges against other men____” (footnote omitted)
• \[T]he prosecuting witness in a rape case may be asked whether she has made similar charges against other men....\ (footnote omitted)
• cross-examination of plaintiff about two prior personal injury claims
• cross-examination of plaintiff about two prior personal injury claims
• such evidence worth more than it costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).