Skip to main content
· 7/10/2007

Mintun v. State

Citations

  • 168 P.3d 40
  • 144 Idaho 656
  • 2007 Ida. App. LEXIS 68
  • 2007 WL 1975624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding winnowing out weaker arguments on appeal and focusing on those more likely to prevail, is hallmark of effective appellate advocacy
  • holding it possible to bring ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failure to raise particular claim in post-conviction proceeding
  • holding it is not deficient performance to decline to raise nonfrivolous issues on appeal
  • “[A] trial attorney’s failure to object to inadmissible evidence or other potential errors may be done for legitimate strategic or tactical purposes.”
  • “[T]he process of winnowing out weaker arguments on appeal and focusing on those more likely to prevail, far from being the evidence of incompetence, is the hallmark of effective appellate advocacy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Perry, Gutierrez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.