Skip to main content

Minter v. State

Citations

  • 537 S.E.2d 769
  • 245 Ga. App. 327
  • 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 3368
  • 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Wjhen evaluating alleged error, the charge must be considered as a whole, rather than reviewed piecemeal. [Cit.]”
  • because court’s remark did not indicate a recognition of its discretion, the sentence was vacated and the case was remanded for resentencing
  • because court’s remark did not indicate a recognition of its discretion, the sentence was vacated and the case was remanded for resentencing
  • full concurrence in majority opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Miller, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.