Minter v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]hile the D.C. Circuit has not addressed the issue since the 1992 amendments, every other Circuit to confront it has held likewise [that administrative exhaustion is not required]”
• ADA’s incorporation of Title VII administrative exhaustion requirements does not apply to section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
• describing the District’s position in the trial court
• applying Holowecki to ADA claims
• applying Holowecki to ADA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).