Minsky v. Silverstein (In Re Silverstein)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The proper question the court must ask under Section 727(a)(5) is what happened to the assets, not why it happened.”
• “The fact that property has been grata- itously transferred raises a presumption that such transfer was accompanied by the actual fraudulent intent necessary to bar a discharge under 727(a)(2)”
• “The reason for the transfer was to remove his major asset from the reach of his creditors while retaining all the benefits of ownership during a period where he believed the financial condition of his business might deteriorate further.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).