Skip to main content
· 2/2/1990

Minotti v. Lensink

Citations

  • 895 F.2d 100
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1042
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • calling the Attorney General’s refusal to enter the suit “tantamount to the consent of the District Attorney to dismiss the suit”
  • approvingly describing these “numerous options” the district court considered before dismissal
  • dismissal upheld for refusal to heed discovery orders on four separate occasions despite court’s postponement of deadlines and repeated warnings
  • “[A]ll litigants, including pro ses, have an obligation to comply with court orders[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.