Minot Beverage Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because plaintiff may have believed it necessary to file subsequently a more detailed form concerning the amount due does not mean that the objective of the provision was not satisfied by the first letter,” which contained no specification of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).