Skip to main content
· 2/22/2007

Minor Humberto Perez-Vargas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, American Immigration Law Foundation, Amicus Supporting

Citations

  • 478 F.3d 191
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that immigration courts may conduct factfinding related to employment-based adjustment applications as a consequence of their “exclusive jurisdiction” under 8 C.F.R. § 1245.2(a)(1)
  • noting that § 11540 \permits an application for adjustment of status to remain pending\ in certain circumstances
  • noting that “[w]e review de novo the legal conclusions of the BIA,” but “give substantial deference to an agency’s interpretations of its own regulations”
  • explaining the source of the error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Shedd, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.