Skip to main content
· 4/12/1966

Minor-Dietiker v. Mary Jane Stores of Michigan, Inc.

Citations

  • 141 N.W.2d 342
  • 2 Mich. App. 585
  • 1966 Mich. App. LEXIS 799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • consideration distinct from the underlying contract can suffice to make an oral modification of a lease enforceable
  • consideration distinct from the underlying contract can suffice to make an oral modification of a lease enforceable
  • consideration distinct from underlying contract can suffice to make an oral modification of a lease enforceable
  • “The intention of this statute is not to make unenforceable all oral modification agreements, but only those in which no valid consideration is alleged. An oral modification agreement supported by new consideration does not fall within the language of this statute.”
  • “The intention of this statute is not to make unenforceable all oral modification agreements, but only those in which no valid consideration is alleged. An oral modification agreement supported by new consideration does not fall within the language of this statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lesinski, Fitzgerald, Gillis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.