Minnesota v. Kalman W. Abrams Metals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the government \may recover all costs except those that [defendants] prove were inconsistent with the NCP\
• describing “removal actions” as “those taken to counter imminent and substantial threats to public health and welfare”
• \[T]he State may recover all costs except those that appellees prove were inconsistent with the NCP.\
• state’s action did not qualify as removal and state would be held to NCP standards for remedial action because of state’s failure to make determination required by § 300.415(b
• “[T]he State may recover all costs except those that appellees prove were inconsistent with the NCP.”
• removal actions are those \taken to counter imminent and substantial threats to public health and welfare\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).