Minnesota v. Heckler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding compensation for all four attorneys working on case, including time each spent strategizing and discussing the case with co-counsel
• affirming district court’s decision refusing to reduce com-pensable hours where four attorneys worked on the plaintiff’s case in part because “[it] was a difficult case with significant social effects”
• “The entries that the defendants single out, although vague when read in isolation, are not impermissibly vague when viewed in the context of the surrounding documentation.”
• imposition of rate differentials for in-court and out-of-court time discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).