Skip to main content
· 3/4/1999

Minnesota Trust Co. v. Yanke (In Re Yanke)

Citations

  • 230 B.R. 374
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 156
  • 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1271
  • 1999 WL 107990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “at the moment the payment is made, the surety steps into the shoes of the obligee and becomes entitled to pursue his cause of action in subro-gation against the principal.”
  • under Minnesota law, a surety’s right of subrogation remains inchoate until payment is made, but when payment is made, the surety becomes entitled to pursue its cause of action in subrogation
  • summary judgment is warranted where all material facts have been settled by final order or judgment entered in the same or another forum, and only question remaining is application of different law to those established facts
  • summary judgment is warranted where all material facts have been settled by final order or judgment entered in the same or another forum, and only question remaining is application of different law to those established facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roger, Hill, Schermer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.