Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Carborundum Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Barrett and affirming district court's denial of motion to exclude expert testimony which was allegedly \available to the plaintiffs at the time of the proceedings in the Patent Office\ because the evidence was not intentionally suppressed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).