Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Francavilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two-year restriction was “both reasonable and necessary” to protect confidential and proprietary information
• holding two-year restriction was “both reasonable and necessary” to protect confidential and proprietary information
• upholding an agreement that protected the company “in the United States or in any country in which [it] has a plant for manufacturing a product upon which [the employee] worked”
• “Although the restriction offers [the plaintiff] global protection, the restriction is narrowly tailored to protect [the plaintiff] only in the geographic areas where it does business.”
• “Loss of confidential and proprietary information is not measurable in money damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).