Skip to main content
· 2/16/1999

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Appleton Papers Inc.

Citations

  • 35 F. Supp. 2d 1138
  • 50 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1091
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering “practical effect” rather than “form” in determining whether agreement was terminable at will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.