Minnesota Life Insurance v. Kagan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Starr does not suggest that the New York Court of Appeals “would preclude holder claims altogether”
• “[D]amages for fraud are to be calculated to compensate plaintiffs for what they lost because of the fraud . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).