Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statement published five months after the plaintiff’s termina- tion was not made in the course of dismissal
• statements made five months after dismissal were not concurrent with it, and thus \stigma plus\ not shown
• five month separation between termination and alleged defamation precludes constitutional defamation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).