Minnesota Chippewa Tribal Housing Corp. v. Reese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Unlike the Oneida Indians, there is no similar assertion by the [tribal housing corporation] that the nature and source of its right to possession is dependent upon Federal law.”
• “Although the federal government has long had a special relation to the American Indian, there is no jurisdiction in the federal courts to hear a case merely because an Indian ... is a party to it.” (citations omitted).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).