Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that MPCA requirement for site-specific water quality criteria was not a rule
• stating that this court defers to agency expertise
• “It is difficult to conclude that the MPCA arbitrarily and capriciously failed to consider social and economic factors, when public hearings were held in several locations and when the MPCA responded to public reaction by revising some of the proposed amendments.”
• evaluating rule’s compliance with constitutional due process standards
• evaluating rule’s compliance with constitutional due process standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).