Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that goals statement in applicable planning document was not “sufficiently specific to establish a prescribed standard”
• describing process that involved researching costs and needs and informally considering both favorable and unfavorable public input as legislative
• identifying as “indi-cia of quasi-judicial actions ... (1) investigation into a disputed claim and weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding the. disputed claim”
• noting quasi-judicial conduct marked by binding decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).