· 6/3/1957
Minkus v. Sarge
Citations
- 83 N.W.2d 310
- 348 Mich. 415
- 1957 Mich. LEXIS 436
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an oral request and statement that the request was an “extra” to the contract, coupled with the fact that the disputed matters were “matters of frequent conversation” between the plaintiff and the defendant, was inconsistent with a claim that there was no waiver
- holding that an oral request and statement that the request was an \extra\ to the contract, coupled with the fact that the disputed matters were \matters of frequent conversation\ between the plaintiff and the defendant, was inconsistent with a claim that there was no waiver
- holding that an oral request and statement that the request was an “extra” to the contract, coupled with the fact that the disputed matters were “matters of frequent conversation” between the plaintiff and the defendant, was inconsistent with a claim that there was no waiver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black, Carr, Dethmers, Edwards, Kelly, Sharpe, Smith, Voelker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.