· 12/30/1966
Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp.
Citations
- 18 N.Y.2d 521
- 223 N.E.2d 793
- 277 N.Y.S.2d 268
- 24 A.L.R. 3d 1154
- 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 895
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the 1964 amendment to section 5-701(a) (10) clearly precludes any recovery in quantum meruit
- holding that the legislature intended to preclude recovery in quantum meruit for brokers and finders
- holding that section 5-701(a)(10) “make[s] clear that the contracts required to be evidenced by writing include a contract or agreement for the compensation of a business broker ... and that the requirement cannot be avoided by an action for compensation in quantum meruit”
- the 1944 legislature in enacting subdivision 10 intended to include “finders” within the operation of the statute and to preclude any recovery in quantum meruit
- the 1944 legislature in enacting subdivision 10 intended to include “finders” within the operation of the statute and to preclude any recovery in quantum meruit
- “It is possible for a finder to accomplish his service by making only two phone calls and, if the parties later conclude a deal, he is entitled to his commission.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keating, Desmond, Fuld, Van Vooehis, Buekb, Scileppi, Bebgah
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.