Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Avenue Associates, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a concrete figure gives a defendant proper notice of the amount at stake, whereas a demand “in excess of’ a certain amount only sets a floor for damages
• concluding “that an ad damnum clause that seeks damages ‘in excess of a stated amount cannot satisfy the plain language directive of Rule 2-305, that ‘a demand for a money judgment shall include the amount sought’ ”
• defining “proximate cause” as “losses that actually resulted from the breach” and “reasonable certainty” as “the likelihood of the damages being incurred as a consequence of the breach, and their probable amount”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).